Submission Preparation Checklist
As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.
- The submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another journal for consideration (or an explanation has been provided in Comments to the Editor).
- The submission file is in OpenOffice, Microsoft Word, or RTF document file format.
- Where available, URLs for the references have been provided.
- The text is double-spaced; uses a 12-point font; employs italics, rather than underlining (except with URL addresses).
- The text adheres to the stylistic and bibliographic requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines.
Guide for contributors
Geologia Croatica welcomes original scientific papers dealing with diverse aspects of Geology, the history of the Earth, and the physical changes that the Earth has undergone or it undergoing. Papers especially concerning the Pannonian Basin, Dinarides, the Adriatic/Mediterranean region, and/or karst, as well as notes and reviews interesting to a wider audience (e.g. review papers, book reviews, and notes) are welcome. Manuscripts should be written in English.
All authors wishing to submit their manuscript to Geologia Croatica should send an e-mail to Editorial office email@example.com with their affiliation and a valid e-mail. After receiving username and password by e-mail, authors should register on journal web page www.geologia-croatica.hr as authors. To submit new paper several easy steps should be followed in ‘Start a new submission’ section. Text file should be uploaded in word format, and all figures in one pdf file as supplementary files. Please also prepare and upload your manuscript as a single PDF document, with all the captions in the required positions, ready for the reviewing process.
After the review process is finished, please make your corrections in the word file of your manuscript using “track changes” or “comments”, so your corrections can be easily noted. Also, if a reviewer wrote a letter to an author, each reviewer statement should be accepted or declined and argumented in a written form. Please upload the corrected version of your manuscript in the period of least 3 months days after you have received the reviewer’s comments.
Manuscripts should be in double spaced typescript with 2.5 cm margins. The title should be informative, but short. It should be followed by the complete First Names and Surnames of all authors and their addresses. The postal addresses of the author(s) should be given in the following order: department/section, institution, address, state; e-mail address for all or only for the corresponding author.
Double-spaced manuscript typed on one side of A4 paper, prepared in word with font size 12 points, 2.5 cm margins, limited to a maximum of 16 printed journal pages will be published without charge. As such, 3 manuscript pages equate to 1 journal page (1 journal page = ca. 900 words). Please take into consideration that every inserted Figure and Table will reduce the amount of text.
• 3 manuscript pages (double line spacing) of plane text = 1 journal page = ca. 1000 words.
• 2 manuscript pages (double line spacing) + Image area of 18x10cm = 1 journal page = ca. 770 words
Larger manuscripts can also be accepted but expense involved will be charged to the authors account (40 EUR for each printed page over the limit).
A brief informative abstract of 50–300 words should be included, as well as carefully chosen keywords proposed by the author(s).
The text should be supplied as a word processing file, preferably in .rtf format, alternatively in .doc format. The text should be in single-column format. Keep the layout of the text as simple as possible – most formatting codes will be removed and replaced on processing the article. In particular, do not use the word processor’s options to justify text or to hyphenate words. However, do use bold face, italic, subscript, superscript etc. Use tab marks to indent the first line of a paragraph, and not ‘indent’ command or spaces. SI units are obligatory. All measurements should always be given in figures, e.g. 12 m, except where the number begins the sentence. To avoid unnecessary errors you are strongly advised to use the ‘spellchecker’ function of your word processor.
Each illustration must have a caption, which is relevant and explanatory. List of captions should be put at the end of the text after references.
Graphics and Tables
A high standard of illustration quality is desired. Bar scales are preferred. The maximum size of plates is 165 x 245 mm. The maximum width of illustrations in the text (photographs, tables and drawings) is 80 mm (for one column) or 165 mm (for two columns). The number of Tables and Figures must be limited to those that are essential for understanding.
Tables must not exceed 1 journal page in extent.
Colour illustrations could be used. A web version (pdf) will be in color, but the printed version will be black and white. There is a possibility to pay for colour illustrations. Please ask Editorial office about this possibility.
• All photographs and graphics must always be provided as separate files.
• Please, plot the figure number and the author’s names in the corner of the graphics.
• Make sure you use uniform lettering and sizing of all your original artwork.
• Only use the following fonts in your illustrations: Arial, Helvetica, Symbol.
• Number the illustrations according to their sequence in the text.
• Produce images near to the desired size of the printed version.
Please save graphics in the original format and size in which it was created.
• Preferred format for graphics is PDF.
• TIFF or highest-quality JPEG–Colour or greyscale photographs (halftones): figure in the final size should have a minimum resolution of 300 dpi (600 dpi recommended).
• TIFF or highest-quality JPEG–Bitmapped line drawings: figure in the final size should have a minimum resolution of 600 dpi (1000 dpi recommended).
Please do not
• Supply embedded graphics in your word processor (spreadsheet, presentation) document.
• Supply files that are optimised for screen use (like GIF, BMP, PICT, WPG); the resolution is too low.
• Supply files that are too low in resolution.
• Submit graphics that are disproportionately large for the content.
• Submit scans of previously published graphics.
• Artificially enlarge the resolution of photographs; it will decrease and not increase the quality of illustrations.
• Supply files that are encrypted or password protected.
Genera and Species names
Genera and Species names should be written in Italics, e.g. Chrysalidina gradata D’ORBIGNY, or Chrysalidina gradata D’ORBIGNY, 1839.
Titles of palaeontological chapters with the description of a taxon should be written like this:
Genus Pseudolitanaia Mamet & Préat, 1994
Pseudolitanaia graecensis (Hubmann, 1990)
(Fig. 4 B, Fig. 5 B; Pl. 1, Figs. 1−3, Pl. 2, Fig. 7)
1990 Litanaia graecensis – Hubmann, p. 148−150, figs. 3−4, pl. 35, figs. 1−6
1994 “Litanaia” graecensis – Herrmann & Hubmann, p. 200, pl. 1, fig. 5
1994 Pseudolitanaia graecensis – Mamet & Préat, p. 148
The words ‘Plate’ and ‘Figure’ should be shortened to ‘Fig.’ and ‘Pl.’ respectively, unless at the beginning of a sentence. When referring to other papers, use ‘pl.’ and ‘fig.’, and when more than one figure is involved use ‘pls.’ and ‘figs’, e.g. SCHMITT (1979, pl. 16, figs. 3, 4; pl. 22, fig. 2). When referring to a particular page use ‘p.’, e.g. (GROTZINGER & JAMES, 2000, p. 9). If the same reference is cited immediately after, use ‘idem’, e.g. (idem, p. 19).
References in the text should be listed by giving the author’s surname (in capital letters) followed by the year of publication in parentheses, e.g. SOKAČ (2007) or CONRAD, M.A. & CLAVEL, B. (2008). When reference is made to work by more than two authors, the first name should be followed by “et al.”, e.g. BRACK et al. (1999). If several papers by the same author and from the same year are cited, a, b, c, etc. should be put after the year of publication, e.g. KOROLIJA & JAMIČIĆ (1989a, b). For poorly known or old journals please submit their unshortened name and the place of publication. If the reference has it’s doi number it should be included in the end of the reference.
Complete references should be listed in alphabetical order at the end of the paper and authors must provide English translations of article titles written in less known languages. Abbreviations of journal names can be found on the web page:
Please follow these examples:
BRACK, P., RIEBER, H. & URLICHS, M. (1999): Pelagic successions in the Southern Alps and their correlation with the Germanic Middle Triassic.– In: BACHMANN, G.H. & LERCHE, I. (eds.): Epicontinental Triassic, International Symposium, Halle/Saale, Sept. 21–23, 1998. Zbl. Geol. Paläontologie, 1998/7–8, 853–876.
CONRAD, M.A. & CLAVEL, B. (2008): A Lithocodium and Bacinella signature of a late Hauterivian, local microbial event: the Urgonian limestone in South−East France.− Geol. Croat., 61/2−3, 239−250.
COZZI, A. (2002): Facies patterns of a tectonically-controlled Upper Triassic platform–slope carbonate depositional system (Carnian Prealps, northeastern Italy).– Facies, 47, 151–178. doi: 10.1007/BF02667711
FISHER, R.V. & SCHMINCKE, H.-U. (1984): Pyroclastic Rocks.− Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 472 p.
KOROLIJA, B. & JAMIČIĆ, D. (1989a): Osnovna geološka karta SFRJ 1:100000, list Našice L34−85 [Basic Geological Map of SFRY 1:100000, Našice sheet – in Croatian].– Geološki zavod, Zagreb, Savezni geološki zavod, Beograd.
KOROLIJA, B. & JAMIČIĆ, D. (1989b): Osnovna geološka karta SFRJ 1:100000. Tumač za list Našice L34−85 [Basic Geological Map of SFRY 1:100000, Geology of the Našice sheet – in Croatian].– Geološki zavod, Zagreb, Savezni geološki zavod, Beograd, 45 p.
PALMER, A.N. (2006): Digital modeling of karst aquifers – Successes, failures, and promises.– In: HARMON, R.S. & WICKS, C.M. (eds.): Perspectives on Karst Geomorphology, Hydrology, and Geochemistry. A Tribute Volume to Derek C. Ford and William B. White. Geol. Soc. Amer., Spec. Pap., 404, 243–250.
SOKAČ, B. (2007): Upper Hauterivian algae – south of Mali Troglav.– In: GRGASOVIĆ, T. & VLAHOVIĆ, I. (eds.): 9th International Symposium on Fossil Algae – Croatia 2007, Field Trip Guidebook and Abstracts. Croatian Geological Survey, Zagreb, 79–81.
VRSALJKO, D. (2003): Biostratigrafija miocenskih naslaga Žumberačkog i Samoborskog gorja na temelju mekušaca [Biostratigraphy of Miocene deposits of Žumberačko and Samoborsko gorje Mts. on the basis of molluscs – in Croatian, with an English Abstract].– Unpubl. PhD Thesis, Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb, 147 p.
Unpublished reports from institutional archives should be cited in the text as e.g. ANDRIĆ (2001)2 and refered as footnote.
2ANDRIĆ, M. (2001): Robinson–Duboka Ljuta, seizmička tomografska mjerenja [Robinzon–Duboka Ljuta tomographic measurements – in Croatian].– Unpubl. report, Civil Engineering Institute of Croatia, Zagreb, 30 p.
We strongly discourage references to unpublished papers (reports and other), unless really necessary (e.g. giving credit to a former researcher who actually made a discovery, or similar). We also discourage references to publications of restricted availability, as abstracts, conference’s reports and field-trip guides, unless really necessary (as above), especially ‘self-citation’ of the preliminary results of submitted paper.
Editors firstly check each manuscript for compliance with the journal standards.
All original scientific papers which might be published in Geologia Croatica are then reviewed internationally. Authors are requested to propose 3 or 4 potential competent reviewers for the manuscript.
The duration of the reviewing process is variable, depending on numerous factors. We will do our best do reduce it as much as possible. However, typically the entire process from submission of the first version of the manuscript to publication takes 5 to 10 months, and careful adherence to this guide for contributors will usually significantly decrease the duration of this process.
After revision and correction of the manuscript has been completed, the author should prepare the final version of the manuscript and graphics, according to the reviewer’s and editor’s comments. This version will be sent to the United Kingdom to our language editor, and the manuscript is only ready for publication after any further corrections have been completed.
Page proofs will be sent to the authors. They should be read carefully and returned within a few days.